--- Comment #10 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-13 03:33
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Subject: Bug number PR25631
>
> A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
> The mailing list url for the patch is
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00439.htm
--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-02-13 03:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25631
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00439.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 06:48
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 04:32
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 04:32:16 2006
New Revision: 109869
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109869
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 04:27
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 04:27:31 2006
New Revision: 109868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109868
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 01:06
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 01:06:08 2006
New Revision: 109860
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109860
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-18 00:52
---
Subject: Bug 25631
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jan 18 00:52:21 2006
New Revision: 109858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109858
Log:
2006-01-17 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-08 09:39
---
Patch submitted for review.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25631
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-03 07:16
---
TL does not take into account pending spaces and skips when no bytes have been
used yet so it 'thinks' that it is at the beginning of the record and can not
go left.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-02 06:57 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|
10 matches
Mail list logo