--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 18:48
---
Yes, agree. Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 18:45
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> For a general purpose library like libgfortran I think the best way is to use
> something reasonably portable and consistent
I agree. Do we close this as WONTFIX?
--
fxcoudert at gc
--- Comment #4 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-19 17:51 ---
There are enough pitfalls with using rdtsc that I don't think it's justifiable
to use it for a general purpose timing routine like system_clock. See e.g.:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0505.1/1463.html
h
--- Comment #3 from Helge dot Avlesen at bccs dot uib dot no 2007-02-12
10:03 ---
Subject: Re: assembly snippets for nano second resolution wall clock time
"jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> is this comment about get_clockfreq.o actually correct ? I find it re
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-02-11 10:55 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> If you extract the object
> file get_clockfreq.o from /usr/lib/librt.a then you can call the function
> __get_clockfreq() to determine clock frequency. To extract the routine, try:
>
> ar
