https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #9 from Andrea Corallo ---
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6)
>> The master
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> --- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
> (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6)
>> The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b258e263e0d74ca1f76a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6)
> The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b258e263e0d74ca1f76aeaac5f4d1abef6b13707
>
> commit r11-7288-gb258e263e0d74ca1f76a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Andrea Corallo from comment #5)
> As a side question: do you guys think disabling "isolate-paths" is the
> right workaround for the affected versions or might have harmful side
> effects?
It oug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b258e263e0d74ca1f76aeaac5f4d1abef6b13707
commit r11-7288-gb258e263e0d74ca1f76aeaac5f4d1abef6b13707
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Corallo ---
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> David Malcolm changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
"dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs"
writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
>
> David Malcolm changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
> Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from David Malco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 50216
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50216&action=edit
Minimal reproducer as a test case
Attached is a minimal reproducer, as a test case. I don't have a fix for thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-02-17
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99126
--- Comment #1 from Andrea Corallo ---
This is the bt of how the C front-end is initializing these
declarations:
#0 set_builtin_decl (implicit_p=,
decl=,
fncode=) at ../../gcc/tree.h:5662
#1 def_builtin_1 (fncode=, name=,
fntype
12 matches
Mail list logo