https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #12)
> what input is this waiting for at the moment?
>From checking the bug history, it looks like Martin Liška was the one to put
this in the WAITING status, which ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
what input is this waiting for at the moment?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager ---
I'm wondering if it'd be possible to insert a line like:
\batchmode
into the tex files?
Ref:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/25267/what-reasons-if-any-are-there-for-compiling-in-interactive-mode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager ---
I've been testing this on the compile farm, and there seems to be a wide amount
of variation between machines with regards to whether this fails or not; I
think it might have to do with different machines ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #8 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> @marxin is this something you checked during the sphinx conversion and
> reversion at all?
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> Well, running 'make latexp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
@marxin is this something you checked during the sphinx conversion and
reversion at all?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> As noted in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-April/592889.html
> the above patch seems to fix "make jit.pdf", but doesn't fix "make jit.dvi";
> it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
As noted in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-April/592889.html
the above patch seems to fix "make jit.pdf", but doesn't fix "make jit.dvi"; it
seems to be looking for .eps files for the images.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:790e9814454662b6cd51d2fce1aa022ef73fedb8
commit r12-8031-g790e9814454662b6cd51d2fce1aa022ef73fedb8
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
make pdf is looking for the images in:
gcc/jit/docs/_build/texinfo/libgccjit-figures
but they're in the source tree in:
gcc/jit/docs/_build/texinfo
I just tried:
git mv gcc/jit/docs/_build/texinfo/*.p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102824
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
13 matches
Mail list logo
