https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 20:26 ---
Suspend.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-07 20:25 ---
Confirmed to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz 2010-01-28 07:26 ---
Ok, it is an ecj bug. I'll report upstream as soon as their bugzilla stops
hanging...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28 07:07 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So java front end bugs shouldn't be logged here?
No they should be. Just I was trying to point out gcj uses ecj as the source
front-end. It might be the bytecode compiler which is broke
--- Comment #3 from suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz 2010-01-28 07:02 ---
So java front end bugs shouldn't be logged here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-28 06:53 ---
>Both Sun javac and eclipse
Well gcj uses eclipse source to byte code compiler to compile to byte code so
it might not be a bug in gcj's byte code compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
--- Comment #1 from suckfish at ihug dot co dot nz 2010-01-28 06:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=19736)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19736&action=view)
Test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42892
