--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #15 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 15:07
---
Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #14 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:39 ---
Fixed.
--
aph at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #13 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:38 ---
Subject: Bug 30641
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 1 14:37:54 2007
New Revision: 121463
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121463
Log:
2007-02-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR java/30641
--- Comment #12 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 14:34 ---
Subject: Bug 30641
Author: aph
Date: Thu Feb 1 14:34:11 2007
New Revision: 121462
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=121462
Log:
2007-02-01 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR java/30641
--- Comment #11 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 11:25
---
Yes, I got your email and I sent a jar to that address, had to allow jars
through my mail server. Did you not receive it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #10 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 11:24 ---
I sent you email but I don't know if you received it.
Send the jar to aph at redhat.com
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #9 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 10:57
---
Andrew, The .jar attachment was rejected by the mail server. How can I send the
file you?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #8 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 10:54
---
Sent, by email.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #7 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:44 ---
Give me your jarfile.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #6 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 10:38
---
Hi Andrew,
> If you can duplicate the problem when compiling with -findirect-dispatch then
we won't need all the dependency jars.
Indeed I can. What next?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30641
--- Comment #5 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-01 10:12 ---
>From the Valgrid log I would say that this is a bug in my code.
If I can duplicate the problem in a test case, I can fix it.
If you can duplicate the problem when compiling with -findirect-dispatch then
we won't need
--- Comment #4 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-02-01 08:45
---
ENABLE_CHECKING is not defined.
Would you like me to rebuild the toolchain with checking enabled? (If so you
need to let me know the configure args to add)
/* Define if you want more run-time sanity checks.
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 22:34 ---
Thanks. That valgrind trace sure is interesting.
Do you have a checking-enabled build? You could look
for ENABLE_CHECKING in build/gcc/auto-host.h.
I'm trying to narrow down which load in rewrite_reflection_indexes
--- Comment #2 from msubs at philips dot org dot uk 2007-01-31 10:27
---
Created an attachment (id=12984)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12984&action=view)
Valgrind log
Hi Tom,
Thanks. Attached is a valgrind log.
jc1 invoked as below:
valgrind /home/matt/cross-too
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-30 19:50 ---
>> /home/matt/cross-tools/libexec/gcc/i386-mingw32msvc/4.3.0/jc1: corrupted
>> double-linked list: 0x00fbeb60 ***
One thing you could try is re-run the command with '-v'. Then look for the
jc1 command line,
16 matches
Mail list logo
