--- Comment #7 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-26 00:01 ---
I think this is fixed now.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |tromey at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 23:37 ---
Note that this isn't quite fixed yet, as we haven't documented
how to handle gcjh.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28938
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-18 23:36 ---
Subject: Bug 28938
Author: tromey
Date: Wed Oct 18 23:36:32 2006
New Revision: 117868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117868
Log:
PR java/28938:
* doc/install.texi (Prerequisite
--- Comment #4 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-21 17:07 ---
Maybe a --with-installed-ecj-jar=/path option would be good.
Then a distro like fedora could build gcj by pointing it at
an already-installed ecj; we could install a little sh script
in the right place that would run
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2006-09-21
08:21 ---
Subject: Re: [ecj] update build instructions to account for
changes
> This is found using the normal gcc specs approach. In a distribution
> I'd expect ecj1 to end up in the gcc-lib dir. In my case I
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-20 17:04 ---
Yes, I plan on making an ecj jar download available.
In the near term I will put one on gcc.gnu.org (or elsewhere).
In the longer term I plan to get my ecj changes upstream, and then
we will be able to point people at
--- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-09-13 10:43 ---
A somewhat disconnected comment on the ecj-branch build process...
Are you planning to distribute ecj as a JAR file too? If so, there should be
no changes to the documentation for building out of tarballs.
If you don't wa
