[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2016-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-02-03 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 --- Comment #24 from Ralf Wildenhues 2011-02-04 05:52:01 UTC --- Author: rwild Date: Fri Feb 4 05:51:57 2011 New Revision: 169822 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169822 Log: Fix PR java/21206: Unrecognized option '-Wl,-rpa

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-29 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-07-26 23:31:49 |2011-01-10 CC|

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2011-01-10 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjg at gnu dot org --- Comment #21 from

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2009-11-07 Thread pierre42d at 9online dot fr
--- Comment #20 from pierre42d at 9online dot fr 2009-11-07 12:24 --- I have the same problem with 4.4.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2009-08-17 Thread org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com
--- Comment #19 from org dot gnu dot gcc dot bugzilla at pooryorick dot com 2009-08-17 15:16 --- I bumped into this issue with gcc-4.4.0 on x86_32 Linux, probably because I have standalone libiconv installed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2007-11-15 Thread tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
Technologies Corporation http://www.midtechcorp.com - website +1.303.898.6300 - Cell / Voicemail +1.610.887.5155 - Fax --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: "wilson at tuliptree dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2007-11-14 Thread wilson at tuliptree dot org
--- Comment #17 from wilson at tuliptree dot org 2007-11-14 23:46 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 23:16 +, tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com wrote: > i'm receiving a very similar error under solaris 2.10, binutils and

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2007-11-14 Thread tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com
--- Comment #16 from tom_francen at midtechcorp dot com 2007-11-14 23:16 --- i'm receiving a very similar error under solaris 2.10, binutils and core utils (latest versions), gnu make, etc. gcc 4.1.2 built fine ... gcc 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 fail with the same error below ... /usr/bin/ksh

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2007-11-14 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-14 23:04 --- *** Bug 34097 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-24 Thread shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #14 from shanwill44 at yahoo dot com 2006-02-25 07:18 --- > I changed the libgcj.spec file manually to the second. That seems to work. > So, my conclusion is to change the libgcj.spec.in. > The following line: > *lib: -lgcj -lm @LIBICONV@ @GCSPEC@ @THREADSPEC@ @ZLIBSPEC@

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-24 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #13 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2006-02-24 14:57 --- (In reply to comment #12) > It appears that the LT stands for libtool. So the first one (LIBICONV) is > supposed to be used for linking if you aren't using libtool, and the second > one > (LTLIBICONV) is used

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-24 00:49 --- It appears that the LT stands for libtool. So the first one (LIBICONV) is supposed to be used for linking if you aren't using libtool, and the second one (LTLIBICONV) is used for linking if you are using libtool. I

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #11 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 16:17 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Andrew Haley schrieb: > Rainer Emrich writes: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Andrew Haley schrieb: > > >

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 15:41 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Rainer Emrich writes: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrew Haley schrieb: > > Rainer Emrich writes: > > > The config.log in libj

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #9 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 14:45 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Haley schrieb: > Rainer Emrich writes: > > The config.log in libjava has two entries for

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread aph at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8 from aph at redhat dot com 2006-02-23 13:38 --- Subject: Re: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly Rainer Emrich writes: > The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv: > LIBICONV > which is > LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linu

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2006-02-23 Thread r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com
--- Comment #7 from r dot emrich at de dot tecosim dot com 2006-02-23 11:04 --- Subject: Re: gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly The config.log in libjava has two entries for libiconv: LIBICONV which is LIBICONV='/appl/shared/gnu/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libiconv.s

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-07-26 Thread wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-26 23:31 --- I saw this problem on an x86-freebsd machine yesterday. The problem is that $target/libjava/libgcj.spec has this *lib: -lgcj -lm /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib %{!pthread: %{!share

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||dish at csua dot berkeley ||dot edu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 19:46 --- Hmm, since this has now reported on i686-pc-linux-gnu, I have no idea what is going on. The only thing I can think of is gcj is being miss compiled but I really doubt that since this also on sparc too.

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 19:44 --- *** Bug 22323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-07-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-13 19:43 --- *** Bug 22468 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-04-25 Thread shanwill44 at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From shanwill44 at yahoo dot com 2005-04-26 00:10 --- Sure I also confirmed it working on i686-pc-linux-gnu (SuSE 9.2). So this must be specific to i386-pc-solaris2.9. Thanks in advance. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-04-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-25 13:29 --- It passes correctly for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206

[Bug java/21206] gcj seems not to pass the option to ld correctly

2005-04-25 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |java Keywords||build http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21206