--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-19
18:52 ---
Ada and Java bugs are not release-critical; therefore, I've removed the target
milsetone.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 23:06
---
I finished up porting the other part of the expand part.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 21:19
---
Note I attached the front-end part so the only thing left is to fix up libjava to emit
the vtables again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18190
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2004-11-04 18:46 ---
Here's my thoughts about this:
- This optimization only ever worked for source compilation. Bytecode compilers
always emit array initializers as code, so for byte compilation it makes no
difference.
- I don't s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-04 04:53
---
Some of the code from java_expand_expr should be moved into
java_gimplify_new_array_init.
And maybe fix up libjava code or maybe just storing the array's vtable by using a
store. I might look
into doing
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 01:39
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
