https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #4 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
>
> --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
> (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> > Martin,
> > I think we can close this (possibly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Martin,
> I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)
Depends. ANCESTOR got generalized a bit but the propagation at IPA-CP level
still does not take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin,
I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
In general it seems to me that ancestor fuction does not serve much use:
it could be replaced by passthrough with POINTER_PLUS parameter and
handle same information.
However it may make sense to have special p
