https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 12:13:04 2017
New Revision: 252808
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252808&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r249735
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 09:13:29 2017
New Revision: 252792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r249735
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Fri Sep 15 08:12:30 2017
New Revision: 252782
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252782&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r249735
2017-09-15 Martin Liska
Backport from mainl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #12 from Billy O'Mahony ---
Thanks, Martin. That's great. Can you update the ticket with the fixed versions
when you get a chance?
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> (In reply to Billy O'Mahony from comment #10)
> > Hi Al
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Billy O'Mahony from comment #10)
> Hi All,
>
> thanks to Martin, Nathan and Richard for working on and fixing this issue.
>
> Can anyone say if the fix will be back ported to future point relea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #10 from Billy O'Mahony ---
Hi All,
thanks to Martin, Nathan and Richard for working on and fixing this issue.
Can anyone say if the fix will be back ported to future point releases of the
5.x, 6.x, 7.x versions?
Regards,
Billy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Jun 28 12:47:24 2017
New Revision: 249735
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249735&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Do not allow to inline ifunc resolvers (PR ipa/81128).
2017-06-28 Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 41607
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41607&action=edit
Patch candidate
Idea is to not allow to inline via an ifunc alias and do not allow to
can_replace_by_local_alias
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
--- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell ---
the ifunc attribute is essentially slightly different syntactic sugar to the
alias attribute. It sounds like the optimizer is treating the attribute as-if
it were an alias.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81128
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
13 matches
Mail list logo