https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113478
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
> Possibly, at least when we know it doesn't expand to a libatomic call? OTOH
> even then a function just wrapping such call should probably be inlined,
> so the question is whether the problem that
> is esti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113478
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Probably is_inexpensive_bulitin_p should return true here?
Possibly, at least when we know it doesn't expand to a libatomic call? OTOH
even then a function just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113478
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Probably is_inexpensive_bulitin_p should return true here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113478
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
