https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #13 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> (In reply to Hanke Zhang from comment #11)
> > But I have never seen this '_FORTIFY_SOURCE' before. So I'm a confused as
> > well. And when I try gcc@11.4 built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Hanke Zhang from comment #11)
> But I have never seen this '_FORTIFY_SOURCE' before. So I'm a confused as
> well. And when I try gcc@11.4 built in the default ubuntu 22.04, it's the
> same. So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #11 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10)
> The difference between the 2 is the costing of the __printf_chk/puts:
> _FORTIFY_SOURCE case:
> freq:0.20 size: 3 time:2.43 __printf_chk (1, "Object code gene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The difference between the 2 is the costing of the __printf_chk/puts:
_FORTIFY_SOURCE case:
freq:0.20 size: 3 time:2.43 __printf_chk (1, "Object code generation not
active! Forgot to call quantum_objcode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #56046|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #8 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Add -save-temps and attach the resulting .i (or .ii) file.
Thank you. I have attached it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #7 from Hanke Zhang ---
Created attachment 56046
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56046&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Add -save-temps and attach the resulting .i (or .ii) file.
This is documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ under the section of `What we
need `.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Add -save-temps and attach the resulting .i (or .ii) file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #4 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Oh I see the compiler you are testing with defaults with fortify turned on.
> That is the difference.
> Maybe also with pie turned on by default tlalso.
>
> Can y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Oh I see the compiler you are testing with defaults with fortify turned on.
That is the difference.
Maybe also with pie turned on by default tlalso.
Can you provide the full output of gcc -v and also the pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #2 from Hanke Zhang ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I cannot reproduce this on the trunk (or even in 12.3.0):
>
> Split point at BB 3
> header time: 1393.311190 header size: 33
> split time: 2.226400 split size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111672
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I cannot reproduce this on the trunk (or even in 12.3.0):
Split point at BB 3
header time: 1393.311190 header size: 33
split time: 2.226400 split size: 2
bbs: 3
SSA names to pass:
Refused: split s
13 matches
Mail list logo
