[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-02 Thread huntazhang at tencent dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 --- Comment #5 from huntazhang --- YES DUP.

[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-02 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2) > Likely dup of PR97540. Yes, it should be.

[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Sta

[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com,

[Bug inline-asm/97667] [11 Regression] a bug in asm_operand_ok() recog.c:1801

2020-11-01 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97667 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|