[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2019-02-21 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2018-12-06 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Dec 6 17:47:52 2018 New Revision: 266859 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266859&root=gcc&view=rev Log: asm qualifiers (PR55681) PR55681 observes that currently only one q

[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2018-10-28 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2018-10-28 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- There's a proposal to add "asm inline" too, which seems like it would be relevant here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00748.html

[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2018-07-27 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug inline-asm/55681] Qualifiers on asm statements are order-dependent

2017-07-28 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55681 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|