https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #8 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Simon Willcocks from comment #2)
> > That's not an accurate description of the problem; the value of the variable
> > is being passed, not its add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #7 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> Moving the line is the right fix
Thanks for the confirmation.
> It is recommended to initialize normal automatic variables first and then
> only initialize re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #5 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Simon Willcocks from comment #2)
> > That's not an accurate description of the problem; the value of the variable
> > is being passed, not its add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
--- Comment #3 from Simon Willcocks ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
But thanks for your quick response!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
Simon Willcocks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Simon Willc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101422
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
