https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to xlwu from comment #5)
> A bug found in the JSON format:
>
> in the lines.count and functions.execute_count fields, when the number is
> extremely large , it will be shown as something like: 8.12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #5 from xlwu at synopsys dot com ---
A bug found in the JSON format:
in the lines.count and functions.execute_count fields, when the number is
extremely large , it will be shown as something like: 8.12123199e+08 , even
become a minus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
> I did not have the real statistics yet as our company is not yet moved to
> gcc9 (maybe end of this year ).
>
> and even the size of the compressed file is smaller , but we have to unzip
> and parse it , ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #3 from xlwu at synopsys dot com ---
(In reply to xlwu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > (In reply to xlwu from comment #0)
> > > since gcc9, the gcov did not support intermediate format and replace with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
--- Comment #2 from xlwu at synopsys dot com ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> (In reply to xlwu from comment #0)
> > since gcc9, the gcov did not support intermediate format and replace with
> > json format , our application deeply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
