https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 110072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Mar 7 09:48:02 2018
New Revision: 258329
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258329&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257383
2018-03-07 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:06:45 2018
New Revision: 258296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport r257383
2018-03-06 Martin Liska
Backport from mainli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Feb 5 09:19:18 2018
New Revision: 257383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Document --dynamic-list-data option for --coverage usage.
2018-02-05 Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Sidwell ---
usage is --dynamic-list=file-name, which would be a little awkward.
--dynamic-list-data is probably more useable and available.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #4 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Would it be feasible to force exporting "__gcov_master" to the dynamic symbol
table when coverage instrumentation is enabled?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #3 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Aha, this is the behaviour of the static linker. It is not placing
'__gcov_master' into main's dynamic symbol table. So dlloading the shared
objects do not see it, and have their own instance. To confuse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Sidwell ---
The multiple definitions of gcov_master should not be a problem. The (ELF)
semantics of shared libraries are such that the definition in the main program
preempts the defiitions in the libraries. The libra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
12 matches
Mail list logo