https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Wed Aug 1 10:21:49 2018
New Revision: 263201
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263201&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add memmove to value profiling.
2018-08-01 Martin Liska
PR va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Yes, looks like it is done for memcpy, memset, bzero, etc, but not strncmp,
> memcmp, memmove, strncpy etc.
>
>
Hi David.
Do you have any interesting benchmarks where optimization of such function
wou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35543
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
