https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70e24c9682ddbcade0301665bccd8e7f928d0082
commit r12-6596-g70e24c9682ddbcade0301665bccd8e7f928d0082
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
>
> Even simpler fix, as intrinsics do not accept alternate return specifiers:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
Even simpler fix, as intrinsics do not accept alternate return specifiers:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.c
index a7ecdb401ef..4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 06:40:13PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> In check_variable(), looking at gfc_current_intrinsic_arg[n]->actual,
> there is locus information.
there is *no* locus info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99256
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Last reconfirmed|
