https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c
commit r12-2511-g0cbf03689e3e7d9d6002b8e5d159ef3716d0404c
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #13 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa
---
Created attachment 51017
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51017&action=edit
Updated patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #12 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa
---
Updated patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056163.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I have fixed the glaring mistake in PR94331.c, could you be so gentle
> as to test it to verify that it does indeed solve the problems you found?
The problem seems solved with the updated PR94331.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa
---
Hi Dominique,
Thank you vary much for taking the time to test the patch.
If I understand you correctly the problem is on the test not on the patch
itself, right?
I have fixed the glaring mis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 50890
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50890&action=edit
Updated PR94331.c test file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Easier to read warnings:
pr94331_1.f90:121:10: warning: type of 'checkb_o_ar' does not match original
declaration [-Wlto-type-mismatch]
121 | if(.not.checkb_o_ar(a, 0, ex-1))stop 28
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Domi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #6 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-May/056054.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #5 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Hi Sandra!
I have a patch for this problem, which also seems to work for PR93308, I expect
to post it in the next week, if all goes well.
Best regards,
José Rui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, there are two flavors of failures being diagnosed by the test case.
The first flavor involves the lower bounds of an array passed into a bind(c)
procedure being set to zero in the callee when
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
--- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 48120
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48120&action=edit
C code demonstrating problems.
15 matches
Mail list logo
