[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-30 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-27 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Rather than create a new compiler option, it is possible to compile to an assembler file using -S, look for .ascii „bar/foo.f90\0“ and replace with a sed or perl script according to your specification (for ex

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-27 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 02:55:56PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > AFAIU this PR reports two issues with no or little connection with REPEAT. > Yes, and we have already agreed to close this one bec

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-27 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 06:32:21PM +, zbeekman at gmail dot com wrote: > Also, given that my reproducer code was dumb, should we close this an open a > new issue to track the paths getting embedded? Or sho

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread zbeekman at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #5 from Zaak --- Sorry about the bad reproducer code (name conflict). To create reproducible builds one must be able to strip or at least map source file references from the source/build directory to something more generic or univers

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 05:59:08PM +, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- > (In reply to Zaak from comment #0) > > > Furthermore, there is an error message embedde

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Zaak from comment #0) > When compiled, even with the `-fno-working-directory` flag, the object file > still contains references to the full path to the source file: > > ``` > $ strin

[Bug fortran/89830] intrinsic repeat() is completely broken

2019-03-26 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C