https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Dec 16 17:00:33 2018
New Revision: 267190
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267190&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Dec 16 16:29:43 2018
New Revision: 267189
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267189&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-12-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/88116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #3)
> See pr88116 for a description of what appears to be happening.
So, in array.c (gfc_match_array_constructor), we have this
bit of code
/* Walk the cons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88467
--- Comment #1 from G. Steinmetz ---
Detected, as noted in pr88116 comment 5 :
$ cat z4.f90
program p
print *, [integer :: 1, [integer(4) :: 2, '3']]
end
$ gfortran-9-20181209 -c z4.f90
z4.f90:2:44:
2 |print *, [integer :: 1, [inte
