https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #19)
> Comment on attachment 44718 [details]
> Affected module and example main program
>
> The only way at the moment would be to change
>
> program testprog
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
Comment on attachment 44718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44718
Affected module and example main program
The only way at the moment would be to change
program testprog
use testmod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
The quadratic behavior is gone, but the very large stack usage is not
fixed yet.
Looking further.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 14 12:27:44 2019
New Revision: 270352
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270352&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87352
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Apr 14 12:17:42 2019
New Revision: 270351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-14 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87352
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 6 22:10:28 2019
New Revision: 270184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270184&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2019-04-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87352
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #14 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Created attachment 46064
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46064&action=edit
Patch to instrument gfortran for test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #13 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Created attachment 46063
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46063&action=edit
log (minor edits) from instrumentation patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #12 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Thomas - unfortunately I don't have a copy of what I did. I think reverting
this patch fixes the problem though:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c?r1=254427&r2=254426&pathrev=25442
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10)
> This patch
>
> Index: class.c
> ===
> --- class.c (Revision 269895)
> +++ class.c (Arbe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
This patch
Index: class.c
===
--- class.c (Revision 269895)
+++ class.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1031,11 +1031,13 @@ finalize_component (gfc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
I think this is a high-priority bug that we should try to fix
before the GCC 9 release.
Some discussion here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-03/msg00124.html
Jeremy, you mentioned that you commented o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Created attachment 46003
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46003&action=edit
Much smaller testcase. Switch 73/74 to see the difference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Created attachment 46002
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46002&action=edit
Tiny patch to fix testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy Sanders ---
I think I have worked out where the problem lies. The code contains fixed-sized
arrays of types containing allocatable arrays and other nested types with
allocatable arrays. If I switch the fixed-sized decla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #4 from Jeremy Sanders ---
Janne: This problem is also present on version 7, whereas the other bug is new
in 8. There may be a relation, however.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> so we are generating a factor of 15 more code.
I mean 150.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
22 matches
Mail list logo
