[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Maybe the frontend can adjust the defaults for -ffinite-math-only / -fsigned-zeros in case the IEEE module is not in scope (or whatever constraints apply here from the language standard). That certainly allo

[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-28 Thread mscfd at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 martin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mscfd at gmx dot net --- Comment #5 from martin

[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-28 Thread sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 04:59:53PM +, amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov --- > The multiplication is optimized out under -ffinite-math-only -fno-signed-zeros > (o

[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-28 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comm

[Bug fortran/86350] Missed optimization with multiplication by zero

2018-06-28 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86350 --- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Whoops forgot the code. This code produces subroutine foo(x,y) real x(10), y(10) interface impure elemental function bar(x) real, intent(inout) :: x end function bar