https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 1 18:34:09 2018
New Revision: 261077
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261077&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-01 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 1 02:14:53 2018
New Revision: 261054
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261054&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-31 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon May 28 21:55:31 2018
New Revision: 260851
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260851&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/85840
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun May 27 03:22:11 2018
New Revision: 260802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
Backport from trunk.
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. I think this should be backported as it is a regression I think
on 7 and 8 branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat May 26 17:30:52 2018
New Revision: 260793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-26 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/85840
* i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Joshua Cogliati from comment #9)
--- snip ---
> I could look into either method of fixing this if you want. (And for what
> it is worth, I do have copyright assignment paperwork from both mysel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #9 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Looking at write.c, there are multiple places where things like the pattern:
result = select_string (dtp, f, str_buf, &res_len, kind);
...
get_float_string (dtp, f, source , kind, 0, buffer,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #8 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 44186
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44186&action=edit
Patch by keeping original length
This patches the problem by storing the allocated length in a separate
varia
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #7 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 44185
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44185&action=edit
Patch by checking against original buffer
This is one possible patch for this problem, it just checks if the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I will see if I can reproduce this here with you example and if so will get on
it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #4 from Joshua Cogliati ---
And to replicate it with the simple program:
gfortran -Wall -g -o simple simple.f90
valgrind --leak-check=full ./simple
and you get things like:
==19171== 323 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
--- Comment #3 from Joshua Cogliati ---
Created attachment 44150
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44150&action=edit
simple program to demonstrate problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
Joshua Cogliati changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jjcogliati-r1 at yahoo dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85840
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
17 matches
Mail list logo
