subject:"\[Bug fortran\/82865\] Option \-fdec collides with PDT"

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-07-16 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-07-02 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #14 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #13) > > It seems the backport caused a caused quite a number on testsuite failures > on the gcc-7 branch: > ... I reverted the backport in r262260. Are you certain that

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-07-02 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-29 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #12 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Fri Jun 29 20:29:34 2018 New Revision: 262260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262260&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Revert r262224 (backport of r262221) as PDTs are not supported in 7-branc

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-28 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #11 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Thu Jun 28 16:51:23 2018 New Revision: 262224 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262224&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-28 Fritz Reese gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortr

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-28 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #10 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Thu Jun 28 16:47:19 2018 New Revision: 262223 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262223&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-28 Fritz Reese gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR fortr

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-28 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-28 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #8 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Thu Jun 28 15:31:24 2018 New Revision: 262221 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=262221&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2018-06-28 Fritz Reese gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-27 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #7 from Fritz Reese --- (In reply to Fritz Reese from comment #6) > ... Though I agree -fdec should rarely be mixed with new > Fortran, it is actually simple to patch gfc_match_type() so that it does > match PDTs as a TYPE/PRINT state

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-06-27 Thread foreese at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2017-11-06 00:00:00 |2018-6-27 Assignee|pault at gcc

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2018-03-04 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2017-11-30 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug fortran/82865] Option -fdec collides with PDT

2017-11-06 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82865 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- I would be OK with a hard error. If so, we need to think about any other similir situations with other modern fortran features. Then we get into a game of chasing more rabits. Perhaps best to document and jus