https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As I said, the standard doesn't cover it, so what it will say about it is
unclear.
One thing are non-saved non-common non-use_assoc vars inside of the BLOCK, for
those defining them as automatic variables ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Oct 19 07:38:59 2017
New Revision: 253878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=253878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/82568
* gfortran.h (gfc_resolve_do_iterator): A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82568
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
