https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I will try and will let you now.
Any progress?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #7 from Pasha ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Pasha from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Pasha from comment #2)
> > > > This is my main routine for example
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Pasha from comment #5)
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Pasha from comment #2)
> > > This is my main routine for example
> > > .
> > > .
> > > .
> > > !!$OMP PARALLE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #5 from Pasha ---
(In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #4)
> (In reply to Pasha from comment #2)
> > This is my main routine for example
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > !!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL)
> > DO k=1,nG3
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #4 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Pasha from comment #2)
> This is my main routine for example
> .
> .
> .
> !!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL)
> DO k=1,nG3
>DO jL=1,nL2
> j = idx2start + jL
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #3 from Pasha ---
For example, in this case index variables are not the same in both subroutines
but it blocks running.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
--- Comment #2 from Pasha ---
This is my main routine for example
.
.
.
!!$OMP PARALLEL DO DEFAULT(SHARED) PRIVATE(K,jL)
DO k=1,nG3
DO jL=1,nL2
j = idx2start + jL
IF(masque(j,k))THEN
! dudx
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
