https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #16 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
I guess I just have to wait for a gfortran update in Fedora Core 23?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #14 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
Do I need to compile with "-fcheck=mem" to get it working?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 39024
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39024&action=edit
Pre-processed source file
Minimal command line:
gfortran-5 pr72051.f90 -fcheck=mem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-07-25 00:00:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #10 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
I find this a very unusual response :-( What's the purpose of testing other
compilers when the bug is in version 5.3.1? I'm not happy that the ticket has
been closed without asking me whether I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to wadud.miah from comment #8)
> Hi kargl,
>
> I am getting the bug with gfortran 5.3.1. could you try to reproduce the bug
> with that version?
>
> Regards,
> Wadud.
It compiles with
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #8 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
Hi kargl,
I am getting the bug with gfortran 5.3.1. could you try to reproduce the bug
with that version?
Regards,
Wadud.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to wadud.miah from comment #2)
> Created attachment 39018 [details]
> source code to test gfortran bug
>
> Hello,
>
> I have attached the source code. Simply untar it and set FC to the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #5 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the update. Do you have any time line for the next release that will
(hopefully) resolve this bug?
Regards,
Wadud.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #3 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
When I replied to your email, the mailing list rejected my email and flagged it
as spam. Could you please allow my emails to get through?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
--- Comment #2 from wadud.miah at nag dot co.uk ---
Created attachment 39018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39018&action=edit
source code to test gfortran bug
Hello,
I have attached the source code. Simply untar it and set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72051
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
