https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 18:35:20 2018
New Revision: 260181
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260181&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/70870
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 18:00:41 2018
New Revision: 260176
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/70870
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri May 11 17:32:28 2018
New Revision: 260171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-11 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/70870
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu May 10 22:43:00 2018
New Revision: 260138
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260138&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-10 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/70870
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 07:46:59PM +, gs...@t-online.de wrote:
>
> --- Comment #8 from G. Steinmetz ---
> > These should have a new PR opened for them.
> Done. This is now pr85506.
>
Thanks. I had inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
G. Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #8 from G.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Gerhard Steinmetz from comment #2)
> A variant that aborts with this message directly :
>
> $ gfortran-6 z1.f90
> f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at
> fortran/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
After applying the fix in comment 3 to trunk 258946 the ICE disappears
and an error message appears, as it should be.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: data.c
===
--- data.c (revision 238178)
+++ data.c (working copy)
@@ -489,6 +489,15 @@ gfc_assign_data_value (gfc_exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
A variant that aborts with this message directly :
$ gfortran-6 z1.f90
f951: internal compiler error: in gfc_assign_data_value, at fortran/data.c:449
$ cat z1.f90
program p
type t
integer :: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
14 matches
Mail list logo