[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-10-06 Thread lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 --- Comment #5 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: lkrupp Date: Fri Oct 7 02:24:40 2016 New Revision: 240851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240851&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-10-06 Louis Krupp * gfortran.dg/pr69955.f90: N

[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-10-06 Thread lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-02-25 Thread mrestelli at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 --- Comment #4 from mrestelli --- My problem also shows up at runtime, compilation is fine.

[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Compile time or runtime? (Can't test right now). My check was for run time: running the test grabs my 16Gb of memory. My guess is that the temporary for write(*,*) size( (/( var(i)%ts , i=1,si

[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-02-25 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/69955] Memory leak with array constructor and derived type

2016-02-25 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69955 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|