https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a618b45ac41cf480f54c4fa4014aed6218931290
commit r13-5760-ga618b45ac41cf480f54c4fa4014aed6218931290
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A slightly reduced & rewritten variant of the code in comment#6:
module m
implicit none
private
public :: cx, operator(+)
private :: cx_plus_int! <- why does this make a differenc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #6 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
And for visibility of functions etc., a reduced and modified entry_16.f90 :
$ cat z4.f90
module complex
private :: cx_cadr, cx_radc
type cx
integer :: re
integer :: im
end type
interfac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #5 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
The ICE with associate_6.f03 and -fmodule-private
depends on including "implicit none" in main program :
$ cat z3.f90
module m
private
contains
pure function func (n) result (f)
integer, int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Applying same operations as in comment 1 to derived_external_function_1.f90 :
$ cat z2.f90
module m
private
type t
integer g
end type
end
type(t) function f() result(ff)
use m
ff%g = 42
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Thank you for commenting.
A few comments will follow with melt down (simplified) test cases.
Hopefully, nothing gets lost.
It might have been better to post a handful of separate problem reports
inste
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
To begin with a short example, namely function_kinds_3.f90.
Placing statement "private" explicit in source, reducing a bit,
then compiling without "-fmodule-private" :
$ cat z1.f90
module m
private
10 matches
Mail list logo
