https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Fixed on trunk. Will leave open for a bit to see if there is any fallout.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Feb 23 18:38:31 2016
New Revision: 233641
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233641&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/69456
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 37707
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37707&action=edit
A patch to fix this.
This patch enables the error message. It regression tests OK.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
From the Fortran 95 Standard regarding exponents.
The basic form may be followed by an exponent of one of
the following forms:
(1) A sign followed by a digit-string
(2) E followed by zero or more blank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #3 from Josiah Schwab ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Josiah Schwab from comment #0)
> >
> > I read the code for the function parse_real in libgfortran/io/list_read.c
> > and this behavior appears to exist beca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Josiah Schwab from comment #0)
>
> I read the code for the function parse_real in libgfortran/io/list_read.c
> and this behavior appears to exist because the value '1+1' is permitted a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
