https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Oct 29 19:37:59 2015
New Revision: 229553
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229553&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-29 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67805
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Oct 24 16:20:26 2015
New Revision: 229287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-24 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67805
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
And these variants are silently accepted :
$ cat z5.f90
program p
print *, '1: ', [character(.true.) :: 'x', 'y']
print *, '2: ', [character(.false.) :: 'x', 'y']
print *, '3: ', [character(1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67805
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
For these variants :
$ cat z4.f90
program p
print *, [character([.true.]) :: 'x', 'y']
print *, [character([.false.]) :: 'x', 'y']
print *, [character([1.]) :: 'x', 'y']
print *, [character
