https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
--- Comment #9 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Fixed as 'obvious' in revision: 228169.
Cheers
Paul
2013-09-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67567
* resolve.c (resolve_fl_procedure): For module procedures, take
the parent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Sat Sep 26 17:52:24 2015
New Revision: 228169
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228169&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-26 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/67567
* resolve.c (res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|manu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Author: manu
Date: Fri Sep 25 14:24:11 2015
New Revision: 228131
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228131&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR pretty-print/67567 do not pass NULL as a string
Fortran passes NU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #2)
> Unfortunately I do not master gdb and gcc internals enough for that.
> The check costs two instructions on my x86-64.
Two instructions that we do not need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
--- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Unfortunately I do not master gdb and gcc internals enough for that.
The check costs two instructions on my x86-64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67567
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
