https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 4 18:41:08 2015
New Revision: 227501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR fortran/67429
* error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 4 18:37:50 2015
New Revision: 227500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR fortran/67429
* error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #14)
> Do you want to commit or would you like me to do it?
Please do, I'll have little time for gcc in the next weeks. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #13)
> The patch in comment 9 restores the old (correct?) behavior without
> regression.
Indeed and it gets rid of the problems that I have been encountering.
M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch in comment 9 restores the old (correct?) behavior without regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > Created attachment 36283 [details]
> > Patch for PR65045 that displays the problem
>
> Paul,
>
> Your patch for gcc/fortran/decl.c does not apply on trunk:
>
> if (state == COMP_BLOCK)
>
> is now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #10)
> > Error: Expecting END BLOCK statement at (1)
> > (null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
>
>
> Even if *I* cannot reproduce this, such
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
> The patch for PR65045 is the simplest manifestation that I have found. I am
> very grateful to Dominique for posting this PR because the problem has been
> d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Even with the original patch applied to r227391, I cannot reproduce the error
that you get. On x86_64-linux-gnu, I get:
Starting program: /home/manuel/test1/226953M/build/gcc/f951
~/test1/src/gcc/tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #5)
> >
> > Please read comment 0.
> >
>
> I read comment #0.
>
> THERE IS NO CODE THERE.
>
> THERE IS NO CODE ATTACHED TO THIS PR.
>
> One needs to go to PR65045 to g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
>
> Please read comment 0.
>
I read comment #0.
THERE IS NO CODE THERE.
THERE IS NO CODE ATTACHED TO THIS PR.
One needs to go to PR65045 to get the code
that is causing the error message. Ergo,
this is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> It's the same piece of code causing the problem. One
> needs to go to PR65045 to get the code, so this PR
> is superfluous. When the ICE is fixed, then
> error message should be addressed.
The pie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 08:05:33PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > So, why isn't this a duplic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> So, why isn't this a duplicate of PR65045?
Because PR65045 is about an ICE and this PR is about missing text in the error
messages.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
19 matches
Mail list logo
