[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-10-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-05 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #18 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on trunk. I'll wait a few days to see whether there's any unexpected fallout before backporting to gcc 5.

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-05 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #17 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Aug 5 14:23:42 2015 New Revision: 226632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226632&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/66311 * wide-int.cc

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #16 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #14) > (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12) > > Created attachment 36128 [details] > > Alternative patch > > > > Here's an alternative pa

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #15 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Created attachment 36129 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36129&action=edit Fortran testcase Attached is a Fortran testcase, ready for inclusion in gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg Pl

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #14 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12) > Created attachment 36128 [details] > Alternative patch > > Here's an alternative patch. I haven't yet tested it beyond > an expanded version of the testc

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #12) > Here's an alternative patch. I haven't yet tested it beyond > an expanded version of the testcase, but I think it's easier > to follow if we se

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assigne

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #10 from Kenneth Zadeck --- I have audited the patch for the non memory management issues and it is approved. thanks for doing this. kenny On 08/04/2015 07:38 AM, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #9 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- I've audited the patch for the memory management nightmares; we are safe with it.

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin --- Created attachment 36121 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36121&action=edit Beginning of a patch The existing code mixes gmp allocation with wide_int allocation. With the patch, an extra s

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-04 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-08-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-07-16 Thread zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 --- Comment #5 from Kenneth Zadeck --- thanks > On Jul 16, 2015, at 5:12 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org > wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 > > Richard Biener changed: > > What|Removed

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-07-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-05-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/66311] [5/6 Regression] Problems with some integer(16) values

2015-05-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---