https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Now we have a blocking version for the library, do
> you think we still need blocking in the front end?
See comment 1. See also pr68600.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koeni
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Dominique
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> IMO the matmul inlining should be restricted to small matrices, thus I am
> not convinced that this worth the work.
For large matrix sizes, an external op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
