https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 11 20:28:00 2018
New Revision: 258435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-11 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66128
* simplif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's a problem with maxval:
$ cat maxval_parameter_2.f90
! { dg-do run }
program main
integer, dimension(0,3), parameter :: i = 0
integer, dimension(0,3) :: j = 0
print *,maxval(i,dim=1)
print *,m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Bug 66128 depends on bug 84697, which changed state.
Bug 84697 Summary: [8 Regression] minloc/maxloc not simplified with zero size
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84697
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 6 23:50:01 2018
New Revision: 258305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258305&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-03-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84697
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #11)
> According to your mail at (In reply to kargl from comment #10)
>
> > Closing as fixed.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-03/msg00010.html stil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #12 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Mar 3 19:59:54 2018
New Revision: 258224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258224&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-03 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Mar 3 19:49:20 2018
New Revision: 258223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=258223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-03-03 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66128
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch submitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-03/msg00010.html
This fixes additional failures not included in Gerhard's
testcases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
I've worked out the issues with regression in the testsuite.
(Well, I think I have.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:31:42PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> (In reply to Harald Anlauf from comment #3)
> > Maybe some kind of "shortcut" (similar to Steve's fix for pr83998) can
> > solve this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #3 from Harald Anlauf ---
Maybe some kind of "shortcut" (similar to Steve's fix for pr83998) can
solve this. Not sure where this would fit in.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66128
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Some more examples with other error messages.
This one ...
program p
integer, parameter :: z(0) = 0
print *, count(z > 0)
end
yields :
internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_intrinsic_c
21 matches
Mail list logo
