https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #38 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Wed May 20 14:56:47 2015
New Revision: 223445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2015-05-19 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #37 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #36)
> I am waiting for an official review of the patch, to be allowed to commit to
> trunk. So I am not waiting on you. :-)
I see. Got it. :D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #36 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am waiting for an official review of the patch, to be allowed to commit to
trunk. So I am not waiting on you. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #35 from Jürgen Reuter ---
What are u waiting for?^^ already confirmed in comment #34 that rverything in
our code works with the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #34 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Andre, I checked your patch with r222305 of the gcc 6.0 trunk. Our complete
code (without workarounds for the two remaining cases reported) compiles, and
our complete testsuite works. Thanks for the patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #33 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I can only work on the issue, not do magic.
When you have issues with svn checkout try the gitmirror:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #32 from Jürgen Reuter ---
With gcc-6.0 trunk I cannot test our complete code because of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
For gcc 5 trunk I have massive problems in checking out the svn at the moment,
always getting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #31 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #30 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I can apply this patch on r222550 of
https://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-5-branch/
correct?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35318|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> And Example #2 is: ...
Confirmed too, but no ICE under debugger.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #27 from Jürgen Reuter ---
And Example #2 is:
module foo
type :: t
integer :: n
character(32), dimension(:), allocatable :: md5
contains
procedure :: init => t_init
end type t
contains
subroutine t_init (thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #26 from Dominiqu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter ---
Example 1:
module foo
type :: t
integer :: n
real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: val
contains
procedure :: make => t_make
generic :: get_int => get_int_array, get_int_element
p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could you please post complete tests: i.e. triggering only the relevant error?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter ---
The other failure occurs for
allocate (foo (this%n), source=this%bar)
where n is integer, foo has type
character(32), dimension(:), allocatable
and bar as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter ---
One thing is:
allocate (foo (0:this%dim-1), source=this%get_integral())
where this is some derived type with integer component dim
and TBP get_integral which is a function
generic :: get_integral => get_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #20)
> Juergen, could you meanwhile check, that the patch fixes the issue?
Damn, it seems my text didn't get posted. Being in Japan at the moment, and
sometimes not having th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|WAITING
--- Comment #20 from v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.0 |5.2
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I applied the patch, and did a make in the built folder. I still get the ICE.
Did you do "make install"?
> Or do I have to change the file gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c and do a completely
> new built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #17 from Jürgen Reuter ---
I applied the patch, and did a make in the built folder. I still get the ICE.
Or do I have to change the file gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c and do a completely
new built of the gcc/gfortran compiler suite?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> That patch is relative to current trunk, meaning 6.0.
I think it should not matter: the patch should apply on 5.0.1 or 6.0.
Applied on a patched 6.0 tree it works as advertised.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #15 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
That patch is relative to current trunk, meaning 6.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #14 from Jürgen Reuter ---
(In reply to vehre from comment #13)
> Created attachment 35318 [details]
> Follow-up patch fixing latest regression.
>
> The attached patch fixes the ICE.
>
> Juergen, please check and report back, to pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
--- Comment #13 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35318
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35318&action=edit
Follow-up patch fixing latest regression.
The attached patch fixes the ICE.
Juergen, please check
28 matches
Mail list logo
