https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Apr 22 23:12:30 2015
New Revision: 222343
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222343&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/65429
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Wed Apr 22 22:43:46 2015
New Revision: 222342
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222342&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-04-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/65429
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #4 from drikosev at otenet dot gr ---
So, the proper solution is described at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00163.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #3 from drikosev at otenet dot gr ---
With the patch one can avoid a segmentation fault but I don't know very well
the internals of gfortran.
So, I've no idea if and how one can obtain the length without array elements;
some debugging
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
I wonder if the patches in comment 1 or at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-03/msg00143.html are not papering over the
real issue. I have modified the FX' test as
CHARACTER(*, kind = 4), PARAMETE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
drikosev at otenet dot gr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||drikosev at otenet dot gr
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65429
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
