[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Feb 5 08:06:04 2015 New Revision: 220436 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220436&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-02-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/64757 * resolve.c (resolve_st

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > > Actually pr49213 is a collection of different bugs, one being this PR. IMO > > pr49213 should be split along the different bugs. > > The patch of comment #7 fixes the above as well. > It bootstra

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7) > Created attachment 34607 [details] > Draft patch for the PR > > I believe that this regression was caused by the fix for pr60357. > > The patch is regtesting right

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > > It it certainly related, but I'm not sure it is an exact duplicate. > > In particular the above PR has quite a history and includes several > > test cases.

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- The following is sufficient to get rid of the ICE: Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c === --- gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c(Revision 220

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Actually pr49213 is a collection of different bugs, one being this PR. Right. Exactly for this reason I want to keep it separate. Makes it much

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > It it certainly related, but I'm not sure it is an exact duplicate. > In particular the above PR has quite a history and includes several > test cases. Let's keep it separate for now. I disagree. AF

[Bug fortran/64757] [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|internal compiler error: in |[5 Regression] ICE in