https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Indeed, that's the easy workaround. I'd have thought the obvious definition
> for the single multi-associate statement would be to be a shortcut exactly
> equivalent to nested associates.
In my mind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
--- Comment #3 from Antony Lewis ---
Indeed, that's the easy workaround. I'd have thought the obvious definition for
the single multi-associate statement would be to be a shortcut exactly
equivalent to nested associates.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64678
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C