http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Klose ---
patch posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00785.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #15 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
I think that if the order in which the handlers are executed matters,
something is too fragile in those handlers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #14 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #13)
> This builds gfortran and fixes the testcase, but I haven't tested it beyond
> that.
Together with the patch in comment #10, of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
This builds gfortran and fixes the testcase, but I haven't tested it beyond
that.
Index: lang.opt
===
--- lang.opt(revision 210292)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Note that the above code is broken in other ways:
-Wno-unused-parameter -Wextra will enable -Wunused-parameter, which is not what
should happen.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #0)
> > The gfortran.dg/wextra_1.f test case assumes that -Wextra enables
> > -Wununused-parameter, but this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose ---
Am 09.05.2014 18:02, schrieb manu at gcc dot gnu.org:
> I don't understand how it was working before. What is exactly the
> command-line passed to that testcase?
the test passes just -Wextra, adding either a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> Thus, in GCC - whether Fortran or C - it is enabled with -Wextra, but only
> if also -Wunused is used. The latter is implied by -Wall.
This is not necessari
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #0)
> The gfortran.dg/wextra_1.f test case assumes that -Wextra enables
> -Wununused-parameter, but this does not happen. No warning is printed on
> line 4, lead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #3)
> (In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2)
> > -Wunused-parameter is enabled by -Wall. I'm surprised that -Wextra is used
> > without -Wall, but it happens in t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
"-Wunused-parameter is not included in -Wall but is implied by -Wall -Wextra"
would mean that the test case assumes that it it is implied by -Wextra only.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
--- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #2)
> -Wunused-parameter is enabled by -Wall. I'm surprised that -Wextra is used
> without -Wall, but it happens in the testsuite in more places.
This is not what the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61126
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
16 matches
Mail list logo
