https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Tue Nov 17 00:07:55 2015
New Revision: 230445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/58027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Nov 16 19:15:25 2015
New Revision: 230433
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230433&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/58027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-11/msg00093.html,
compiling the test gives the error
pr60993.f90:7:45:
integer, parameter :: infn(2) = [Z'',Z'FFF0']
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
--- Comment #2 from Fred Krogh ---
Thanks for the suggestion. As a result of another suggestion, I'm using
-fno-range-check and defining infinity as 1.0d0/0.0d0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60993
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from
