[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-08-11 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-06-09 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jun 10 06:05:22 2014 New Revision: 211397 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211397&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/60928 * omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses) : Set la

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-14 Thread quantheory at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #7 from Sean Santos --- Ah, right. Thinking about it again today, my comment 5 is very confused for several reasons, and I don't agree with it anymore. My original interpretation is the only one that makes sense to me again. Namely "

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-14 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Array sections are only allowed in depend, map, from and to clauses, other clauses work only with whole variables, not just portions thereof.

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-14 Thread quantheory at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #5 from Sean Santos --- Well, I thought I understood this, but maybe not. I was thinking that "subobject" in this context meant "component". A "list item" here is just any variable or common block listed in a clause, in this case the

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to Sean Santos from comment #3) > 'For a list item or the subobject of a list item with the ALLOCATABLE > attribute: Frankly, I fail to decipher what a "subobject of a list item with the allocatabl

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-13 Thread quantheory at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 --- Comment #3 from Sean Santos --- OpenMP 4.0 is strange. Sure, it does refer to "allocatable enhancement" as an unsupported feature, which is vague. It might refer to the TR unofficially known as the "Allocatable Enhancements" update, or it mig

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/60928] gfortran issue with allocatable components and OpenMP

2014-05-13 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60928 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNC