http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 08:57:56PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
>
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 32456
> --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 32456
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32456&action=edit
an "improved" complex division
Another variation on the same theme!
The test prints the results for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
Created attachment 32455
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32455&action=edit
cdiv.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
--- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 03:36:35PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> Can you be a little more specific on what you want
> to investigate? AFAIK, the general handling of
> complex division is done be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60646
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
