http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This is not PR 47674 (or so I think).
Why do you think so? The valgrind report in comment 5 is the same as the one in
pr47674 comment 0.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
> gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03 s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's what valgrind has to say:
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Where> cat r.f90
! { dg-do run }
! Test the fix for PR47523 in which concatenations did not work
! correctly with assignments to deferred character l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #3)
> This is with current trunk (as of a few minutes ago), on
> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
I'm on the same platform and don't see the failure with
gcc versio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
This is with current trunk (as of a few minutes ago), on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Where> gfortran -g realloc_on_assign_5.f03
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Where> gfortran -v
Es werden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> Janus, do you have any idea?
Not without any further info:
* What OS/configure line?
* What GCC revision? When did it show up?
* Can you generate a b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60542
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
