http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Further support from valgrind on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
I was not questioning the PR, but the regression: if I don't see the leak at
4.9 on my builds, there is a suspicion that the bug may have been l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589
--- Comment #10 from Rich Townsend ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9)
> > So it's actually a regression.
>
> Marking as a regression, even if I am not fully convinced.
Further support from valgrind on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu:
==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59589
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Memory leak when|[4.9 Regression] Memory
